The 2010s was the Wild West of the mobile world. "Mobile-first" was the buzzword, much like "AI-first" is today. Every company, from the biggest social media giants to your local pizza parlor, seemed to be pestering you to download their app. There was a genuine hype train, and everyone was on board. The apps, frankly, were always mediocre, and a far cry from the full functionality of their website counterparts. But the message was clear. If you weren't on mobile, you were falling behind.

Fast forward to 2025, and that hype hasn't entirely faded. In fact, it's evolved into something a little more… persistent. If you've ever opened Reddit, LinkedIn, Pinterest, or practically any popular service on your phone's web browser, you've likely encountered it. A relentless push to download their app. They use every dark pattern in the book, subtly nudging you, sometimes even tricking you, into clicking that "Get the App" button. It feels inevitable, doesn't it? Like you're constantly fighting against the current.

But if you're already a regular user, happily browsing their service through your phone's web browser, why are they still so desperate for you to switch to the app?

Beyond the Hype: The Real Reasons Companies Want You on Their App

The answer, in short, is data. A lot of it. And access. A whole lot more of that too.

Think about it this way. What can a website on your browser really get from you? Unless you manually upload your contact information, or there's a serious security vulnerability, a website's access to your phone's deeper functions is quite limited.

Apps, on the other hand, are a different beast entirely. They are designed to integrate much more deeply with your device. When you download an app and want to use a particular feature, you're often prompted to grant various permissions. And let's be honest, how many of us meticulously read through every single permission pop-up? Most of the time, we just tap "Allow" to get to what we want to do.

This seemingly small action can grant companies a treasure trove of information and control:

• Your Contacts: Want to find friends on the app? Grant access to your contacts. Just like that, your entire network might be uploaded.
• Location Tracking: GPS and even your phone's accelerometer can be used to track your precise movements and identify patterns in your behavior. Websites can try to estimate your location, but it's far less precise and requires explicit permission each time.
• Microphone Access: Some apps can even record audio.
• Installed Apps: Yes, apps can often detect what other applications you have installed on your phone. This information can be used to build a more comprehensive profile of you and your interests.

All of this data extraction and deeper device interaction is significantly more difficult, if not outright impossible, for a website running in your browser. The web browser, in its own right, is a powerful and increasingly capable operating system. It can play video and audio, support WebGL for advanced graphics, and even has USB support. Most companies aren't even scratching the surface of what's possible with a modern web browser. Their primary motivation for pushing the app, more often than not, seems to boil down to gaining more access to your personal data and behavior.

The Unseen Cost of Convenience

Even if you're not particularly "paranoid" about your data, it's worth asking: what can they possibly want to do in their app that they can't already do in the browser? Often, the answer is nothing that truly benefits you more. The perceived "convenience" of an app often comes at the cost of your privacy and control.

It's incredibly easy to give information away. But once that data is out there, it's nearly impossible to take back. While regulations like GDPR can ensure that data is deleted from a company's database, they can't guarantee that data which has already been sold or shared with third parties will also be erased.

So, the next time you're met with that insistent prompt to download an app, take a moment to consider what you might be giving up. For me, I'm sticking to the website. My browser offers all the functionality I need, without inviting a constant digital spy into my pocket. And that, in my book, is a win for privacy and control.

Neurotic personalities are a staple of science fiction. Researchers who study how people react to robot personalities have recently found that neurotic traits in a robot can make them seem more relatable.

(Image credit: Gregory_DUBUS)

Tech recruiters Howdy surveyed 1,047 full-time professionals who say they use AI. 30% of survey subjects said they were managers. [Howdy]

75% of subjects were expected to use AI at work. 22% felt pressured to use AI when it was not appropriate. So 16% of subjects just say they used the AI when they didn’t! People feel they would be putting their job at risk if they pushed back on AI directives.

A full one-third said that fixing the AI’s mistakes took as much time as not using the AI.

More positively, 72% felt energised by using AI in their workflow! Though this survey screened for people who were already using AI at work.

Howdy found that AI didn’t speed up a lot of people’s work — but the Register notes that two-thirds of employees just accept the AI’s output, right or wrong. [Register]

Others lied to their boss that they didn’t use AI. They worried they’d be seen as freeloaders. That’s a valid worry — if you’re visibly using AI at work, your coworkers really do think you’re an incompetent lazy arse. AI users expected to be considered “lazier, more replaceable, less competent, and less diligent.” Wonder why. [PNAS]

The answer is: use AI when you’re told, don’t use it even when you’re told, fake using AI, don’t fake using AI, just push the AI answers through, and if they give you a metric, hammer it into the ground.

The use case for chatbots at work is: we pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us.

• Video version

One explanation for the rise in obesity in industrialized countries is that people burn fewer calories than people in countries where obesity is rare. A major study finds that's not the case.

(Image credit: PCH-Vector)